ReviewMolecular biotechnology2002
Current perspectives in cancer proteomics.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer and protein biomarkers.World journal of experimental medicine · 2012Article
- Proteomic analysis in multiple myeloma research.Molecular biotechnology · 2011Review
- Strategies for analysis of the glycosylation of proteins: current status and future perspectives.Molecular biotechnology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteome technology has been used widely in cancer research and is a useful tool for the identification of new cancer markers and treatment-related changes in cancer. This article details the use of proteome technology in cancer research, and laboratory-based and clinical cancer research studies are described. New developments in proteome technology that enable higher sample-throughput are evaluated and methods for enhancing conventional proteome analysis (based on two-dimensional electrophoresis) discussed. The need to couple laboratory-based proteomics research with clinically relevant models of the disease is also considered, as this remains the next main challenge of cancer-related proteome research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12405262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.