Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12403645›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2002

Bayesian estimation of methotrexate pharmacokinetic parameters and area under the curve in children and young adults with localised osteosarcoma.

Annick Rousseau, Christophe Sabot, Nicole Delepine, Gerard Delepine, Jean Debord, Gerard Lachâtre, Pierre Marquet

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annick RousseauDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital, Limoges, France. rousseau@pharm.unilim.fr
Christophe Sabot
Nicole Delepine
Gerard Delepine
Jean Debord
Gerard Lachâtre
Pierre Marquet
Université de Limoges · FRUniversité Sorbonne Paris Nord · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethotrexate is the most efficient anticancer drug in osteosarcoma. It requires individual exposure monitoring because of the high doses used, its wide interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the existence of demonstrated relationships between efficacy, toxicity and serum drug concentrations.

objectiveTo develop a maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian estimator able to predict individual pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices such as area under the curve (AUC) for methotrexate from a few blood samples, in order to prevent toxicity and facilitate further studies of the relationships between efficacy and exposure.

methodsMethotrexate population pharmacokinetics were estimated by a retrospective analysis of concentration data from 40 children and young adults by using the nonparametric expectation maximisation method NPEM. A linear two-compartment model with elimination from the central compartment was assumed. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters and AUC were subsequently estimated in 30 other young patients, using MAP Bayesian estimation as implemented in two programs, ADAPT II and an inhouse program Winphar((R)).

resultsThe pharmacokinetic parameters used in the model were the volume of the central compartment (V(1)) and the transfer constants (k(10), k(12) and k(21)). The mean values (with percentage coefficient of variation) obtained were: 18.24L (54.1%) and 0.41 (42.3%), 0.0168 (68.7%), and 0.1069 (61.3%) h(-1), respectively. Bayesian forecasting enabled nonbiased estimation of AUC and systemic clearance using a schedule with two sampling times (6 and 24 hours after the beginning of the infusion) and either program. Collection of a third sample at 4 hours improved the precision.

conclusionThe Bayesian adaptive method developed herein allows accurate estimation of individual exposure to methotrexate and can easily be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticArea Under CurveBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLinear ModelsMethotrexateModels, BiologicalOsteosarcomaRetrospective StudiesSoftwareAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID12403645
OpenAlexW2095340243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.