Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12401135›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2002

Replicate high-density rat genome oligonucleotide microarrays reveal hundreds of regulated genes in the dorsal root ganglion after peripheral nerve injury.

Michael Costigan, Katia Befort, Laurie Karchewski, Robert S Griffin, Donatella D'Urso, Andrew Allchorne, Joanne Sitarski, James W Mannion, Richard E Pratt, Clifford J Woolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 255 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed, 558 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The peripheral Atf3Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Gadd45 in Neuronal Development, Function, and Injury.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael CostiganNeural Plasticity Research Group, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. costigan@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
Katia Befort
Laurie Karchewski
Robert S Griffin
Donatella D'Urso
Andrew Allchorne
Joanne Sitarski
James W Mannion
Richard E Pratt
Clifford J Woolf
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBayer (Germany) · DEBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

ALTERED SENSIBILITY FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL NERVE DAMAGER01NS038253 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WOOLF, CLIFFORD J · 1999 to 2017
$8.2M
SEMAPHORIN ACTIVATION AND ROLE IN NEURONAL REGENERATIONR01HD038533 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WOOLF, CLIFFORD J · 2000 to 2004
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS HD38533NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038533NINDS NIH HHS NS38253NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRat oligonucleotide microarrays were used to detect changes in gene expression in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) 3 days following sciatic nerve transection (axotomy). Two comparisons were made using two sets of triplicate microarrays, naïve versus naïve and naïve versus axotomy.

resultsMicroarray variability was assessed using the naïve versus naïve comparison. These results support use of a P < 0.05 significance threshold for detecting regulated genes, despite the large number of hypothesis tests required. For the naïve versus axotomy comparison, a 2-fold cut off alone led to an estimated error rate of 16%; combining a >1.5-fold expression change and P < 0.05 significance reduced the estimated error to 5%. The 2-fold cut off identified 178 genes while the combined >1.5-fold and P < 0.05 criteria generated 240 putatively regulated genes, which we have listed. Many of these have not been described as regulated in the DRG by axotomy. Northern blot, quantitative slot blots and in situ hybridization verified the expression of 24 transcripts. These data showed an 83% concordance rate with the arrays; most mismatches represent genes with low expression levels reflecting limits of array sensitivity. A significant correlation was found between actual mRNA differences and relative changes between microarrays (r2 = 0.8567). Temporal patterns of individual genes regulation varied.

conclusionsWe identify parameters for microarray analysis which reduce error while identifying many putatively regulated genes. Functional classification of these genes suggest reorganization of cell structural components, activation of genes expressed by immune and inflammatory cells and down-regulation of genes involved in neurotransmission.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesAnimalsApoptosisAxotomyBlotting, NorthernCytoskeletonDisease Models, AnimalGanglia, SpinalGenomeIn Situ HybridizationMaleNeuronsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPeripheral Nerves

Identifiers

PMID12401135
PMCPMC139981
OpenAlexW2168500751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.