Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12399545›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Biological models and genes of tumor reversion: cellular reprogramming through tpt1/TCTP and SIAH-1.

Marcel Tuynder, Laurent Susini, Sylvie Prieur, Stephanie Besse, Giusy Fiucci, Robert Amson, Adam Telerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Normalizing Input-Output Relationships of Cancer Networks for Reversion Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Tctp, a unique Ing5-binding partner, inhibits the chromatin binding of Enok inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Critical transition and reversion of tumorigenesis.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcel TuynderMolecular Engines Laboratories, 20 Rue Bouvier, 75011 Paris, France.
Laurent Susini
Sylvie Prieur
Stephanie Besse
Giusy Fiucci
Robert Amson
Adam Telerman
Molecular Engines Laboratories (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor reversion is the process by which some cancer cells lose their malignant phenotype. This study was aimed at defining some of the molecular and phenotypic properties of this process. Biological models of tumor reversion were isolated from human leukemia and breast cancer cell lines by using the H-1 parvovirus as a selective agent. Differential gene expression analysis was performed between the parental malignant cells and their revertants or alternatively between these parental cells and their SIAH-1 transfectant counterparts. These SIAH-1 transfectants have a suppressed malignant phenotype and were used as a control for a viral-free system. Two hundred sixty-three genes were found to be either activated or inhibited during the reversion process, as confirmed by Northern blot analysis or quantitative PCR. Of these, 32% were differentially expressed in all systems, irrespective of whether parvovirus-selected, SIAH-1 overexpressing, or p53 mutant or wild-type cell lines were used, suggesting the existence of a universal mechanism underlying tumor reversion. Translationally Controlled Tumor Protein (tpt1/TCTP) has the strongest differential expression, down-regulated in the reversion of U937- and SIAH-1-overexpressing cells. Inhibition of TCTP expression by anti-sense cDNA or small interfering RNA molecules results in suppression of the malignant phenotype and in cellular reorganization, similar to the effect of SIAH-1. Hence, tumor reversion can be defined at the molecular level, not just as the reversal of malignant transformation, but as a biological process in its own right involving a cellular reprogramming mechanism, overriding genetic changes in cancer, by triggering an alternative pathway leading to suppression of tumorigenicity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBasement MembraneBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDNA, AntisenseDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansK562 CellsModels, GeneticNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingSeven in Absentia ProteinsTransfectionBiomarkers, TumorDNA, AntisenseDNA, NeoplasmNuclear ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingSeven in Absentia ProteinsTPT1 protein, humanTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID12399545
PMCPMC137530
OpenAlexW2059679192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.