Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12399387›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

Exploring the envelope. Systematic alteration in the sex-determination system of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans.

Jonathan Hodgkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Five newbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A male pheromone that improves the quality of the oogenic germline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan HodgkinGenetics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. jah@bioch.ox.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural sexes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are the self-fertilizing hermaphrodite (XX) and the male (XO). The underlying genetic pathway controlling sexual phenotype has been extensively investigated. Mutations in key regulatory genes have been used to create a series of stable populations in which sex is determined not by X chromosome dosage, but in a variety of other ways, many of which mimic the diverse sex-determination systems found in different animal species. Most of these artificial strains have male and female sexes. Each of seven autosomal genes can be made to adopt a role as the primary determinant of sex, and each of the five autosomes can carry the primary determinant, thereby becoming a sex chromosome. Strains with sex determination by fragment chromosomes, episomes, compound chromosomes, or environmental factors have also been constructed. The creation of these strains demonstrates the ease with which one sex-determination system can be transformed into another.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesSex Determination ProcessesTranscription FactorsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCalpainCell Cycle ProteinsDisorders of Sex DevelopmentFemaleHelminth ProteinsMaleMembrane ProteinsRNA, TransferTemperatureCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCalpainCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsFEM-1 protein, C elegansFem-2 protein, C elegansfem-3 protein, C elegansHelminth Proteinsher-1 protein, C elegansMembrane ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesRNA, Transfertra-1 protein, C eleganstra-2 protein, C elegansTRA-3 protein, C elegansTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12399387
PMCPMC1462291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.