Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12399345›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Martin Eccles, Elaine McColl, Nick Steen, Nikki Rousseau, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Parkin, Ian Purves

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03066596 (Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination), which is not on this map. Cited by 138 papers, 30 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 30 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03066596 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2017 to 2024Enrolled530ConditionsAsthma ChildhoodArmseMPI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 30 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. A systematic review of the implementation and impact of asthma protocols.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Computer decision support systems for asthma: a systematic review.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Pooled it

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin EcclesCentre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK. martin.eccles@ncl.ac.uk
Elaine McColl
Nick Steen
Nikki Rousseau
Jeremy Grimshaw
David Parkin
Ian Purves

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the use of a computerised support system for decision making for implementing evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care.

designA before and after pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial utilising a two by two incomplete block design.

setting60 general practices in north east England.

participantsGeneral practitioners and practice nurses in the study practices and their patients aged 18 or over with angina or asthma.

main outcome measuresAdherence to the guidelines, based on review of case notes and patient reported generic and condition specific outcome measures.

resultsThe computerised decision support system had no significant effect on consultation rates, process of care measures (including prescribing), or any patient reported outcomes for either condition. Levels of use of the software were low.

conclusionsNo effect was found of computerised evidence based guidelines on the management of asthma or angina in adults in primary care. This was probably due to low levels of use of the software, despite the system being optimised as far as was technically possible. Even if the technical problems of producing a system that fully supports the management of chronic disease were solved, there remains the challenge of integrating the systems into clinical encounters where busy practitioners manage patients with complex, multiple conditions.

Indexed as

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedPractice Guidelines as TopicAngina PectorisAsthmaEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeGuideline AdherenceHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID12399345
PMCPMC130060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.