Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12396938›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2002

[The substitution of generic for brand medicines in family medical clinics].

S Casado Buendía, J K Sagardui Villamor, M Lacalle Rodríguez-Labajo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Generic drugs again].Atencion primaria · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Casado BuendíaMédico de Familia. Centro de Salud Tribulete. Area 7. Madrid. España.
J K Sagardui Villamor
M Lacalle Rodríguez-Labajo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the percentage of patients who change from current medication to generic medicine once properly informed.

designObservational, cross-sectional.Setting. Two primary care clinics in Madrid, one rural and the other urban.Participants. Patients who came for their consultation and who take prescribed drugs which have generic alternatives.

methodAll patients included received a standard 40 second verbal explanation about generics. Later, the researcher filled out a 18 items test. A descriptive analysis was done taking into account frequencies and applying a bivariable analysis comparing the variable <<accepted change>> with the others.

results71% of the patients accepted the change to generic medicine, 29% did not. Of the latter, 67.4% said that they preferred to consult with the prescribing physician; 45.1% were of the opinion that it would not have the same effect; a 16.1% said that if it was cheaper, it must be of a worse quality; and another 16.1% said that they would only accept the change if it meant saving some money.The researcher perceived distress and discomfort in 23.4% of the patients. He himself felt satisfied in 83.9% of the cases, indifferent in 12.9% and unsatisfied in 3.2%.

conclusionProviding the adequate information and letting the patients decide for themselves about the substitution of brand for generic drugs resulted in almost three quarters of the cases opting for the change. And this with a minimal professional effort and the added benefit of improving the patient-practioner relationship.

Indexed as

Drugs, GenericCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationHumansPrimary Health CareSpainDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID12396938
PMCPMC7677959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.