Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12393746›Full record

Trial reportBlood2002

Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461).

John C Byrd, Krzysztof Mrózek, Richard K Dodge, Andrew J Carroll, Colin G Edwards, Diane C Arthur, Mark J Pettenati, Shivanand R Patil, Kathleen W Rao, Michael S Watson and 10 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 622 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
622citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00048958 active not recruitingnot on this map

Cytogenetic Studies in Acute Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma: Companion to CALGB Treatment Studies For Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan1984Enrolled9,000ConditionsAcute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Multiple MyelomaArmscytogenetic analysis
NCT01037764 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission Using HLA-matched Sibling Donors, HLA-matched Unrelated Donors, or HLA-mismatched Familial Donors-A Phase 2 Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2010 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Lymphoid LeukemiaArmsalloHCT
NCT01050036 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Phase 2 Study of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Core-binding Factor Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the First Complete Remission

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2010 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsLeukemia, MyeloidArmsautologous hematopoietic cell transplantation
NCT02328885 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Prophylactic Infusion of Donor Lymphocytes in Cord Blood Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBanc de Sang i TeixitsRan2014 to 2017Enrolled17ConditionsLeukemiaArmsDLI of the 20 fraction of the UCBT
NCT04666649 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pegcrisantaspase in Combination With Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2021 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsRelapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsVenetoclax and pegcrisantaspase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

622 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. A Phase I/II Trial of MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Combination with Ixazomib for Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early Peripheral BloodInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

562 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

John C ByrdDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1240, USA. byrd-3@medctr.osu.edu
Krzysztof Mrózek
Richard K Dodge
Andrew J Carroll
Colin G Edwards
Diane C Arthur
Mark J Pettenati
Shivanand R Patil
Kathleen W Rao
Michael S Watson
Prasad R K Koduru
Joseph O Moore
Richard M Stone
Robert J Mayer
Eric J Feldman
Frederick R Davey
Charles A Schiffer
Richard A Larson
Clara D Bloomfield
Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461)

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Cancer and Leukemia Group B - The Ohio State UniversityU10CA077658 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 1998 to 2013
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA16058NCI NIH HHS CA31946NCI NIH HHS CA 77658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed prospectively 1213 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to ascertain the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on complete remission (CR) rate, 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). All patients received similar induction therapy. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 8.3 years. Nonprioritized cytogenetics distinguished t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16) as conferring a significantly better prognosis than normal karyotype. Prognostic impact of many abnormalities could not be determined independently because of their association with complex karyotype. Neither complex karyotype nor secondary aberrations affected outcome of patients with t(8;21), inv(16)/t(16;16), or t(9;11). Among other patients, those with complex karyotypes had significantly worse outcomes than cytogenetically normal patients. Based on outcome for specific cytogenetic abnormalities and karyotype complexity, patients were divided into 3 risk groups: favorable (CR 88%, CIR 54%, OS 55%), intermediate (CR 67%, CIR 67%, OS 24%), and adverse (CR 32%, CIR 92%, OS 5%). Multivariate analyses confirmed the major contribution of cytogenetics to the probability of attaining CR, CIR, and OS. For the adverse-risk group, the probability of achieving CR was 4.0 and 11.9 times lower, the probability of relapse 3.0 and 4.4 times higher, and the risk of death 2.1 and 4.3 times higher than those for the intermediate and favorable groups, respectively. We conclude that although the prognostic impact of many recurring abnormalities has not been ascertained independently of complex karyotype, cytogenetics is among the most useful factors predicting attainment of CR, CIR, and long-term survival in adult AML.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAcute DiseaseAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChromosome InversionChromosomes, HumanCytarabineDaunorubicinDisease-Free SurvivalFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaryotypingLeukemia, MyeloidLife TablesProspective StudiesCytarabineDaunorubicin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.