General practitioners with special clinical interests: a cross-sectional survey.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
   Pooled it
2. Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Trial
3. Regional variations in trajectories of long-term readmission rates among patients in England with heart failure.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019
   Article
4. Patient and professional views of open access hysterosalpingography for the initial management of infertility in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
   Article
5. Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.Gut · 2007
   Review
6. The future of primary care paediatrics and child health.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004
   Article
7. The role of UK general practitioners with special clinical interests: implications for policy and service delivery.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
   Article
8. Patients' and professionals' opinions of services for people at an increased risk of colorectal cancer: an exploratory qualitative study.Familial cancer · 2004
   Article
9. General practitioners with special clinical interests.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
   Article
10. Special non-clinical interests--GPs in education, research, and management.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
11. Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
12. Severe acute respiratory syndrome--novel virus, recurring theme.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
13. Medicine and the Holocaust - lessons for present and future physicians.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  GPs with special interests.2002

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as