Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12392124›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in early pregnancy using self-administered vaginal swabs and first pass urines: a cross-sectional community-based survey.

Pippa Oakeshott, Phillip Hay, Sima Hay, Frances Steinke, Elizabeth Rink, Brenda Thomas, Penny Oakeley, Sally Kerry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01849653 (Self-Obtained Vaginal Swabs for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01849653 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Self-Obtained Vaginal Swabs for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing: Concurrence in Non-Clinical Settings vs. Clinical Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2014 to 2015Enrolled3,500ConditionsChlamydial Infection, Gonococcal Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chlamydia related bacteria (Chlamydiales) in early pregnancy: community-based cohort study.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2017
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006
    Review
  7. Chlamydia screening in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  8. Bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth: a prospective community-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pippa OakeshottDepartment of General Practice, St George's Hospital Medical School, London. oakeshot@sghms.ac.uk
Phillip Hay
Sima Hay
Frances Steinke
Elizabeth Rink
Brenda Thomas
Penny Oakeley
Sally Kerry
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey of 1216 newly pregnant women (mean age = 31 years) from 32 general practices and five family planning clinics was conducted to find the prevalence of chlamydial infection and to evaluate self-administered vaginal swabs and first-pass urines for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction assay. Overall prevalence of infection was 2.4% (95% CI = 1.5 to 3.3) but in women aged less than 25 years it was 8.6% (95% CI = 4.1 to 12.9) and in pregnant teenagers it was 14.3% (95% CI = 3.7 to 24.9). In 1161 women with both swab and urine results, 25 women were positive on both specimens three on swab alone, and one on urine alone. When asked which they preferred to provide, 47% said urine, 59 swab and 48% preferred both equally. This is the first study to show that non-invasive screening in early pregnancy is feasible in the community. Although swabs detected 10% more infections, nearly half the women preferred providing urine specimens.

Indexed as

Chlamydia trachomatisAdolescentAdultChlamydia InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID12392124
PMCPMC1316087
OpenAlexW322950237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.