Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12389766›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement?

Angela Coulter, Glyn Elwyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Coping with an Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on the Role of the Health Care System.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Care planning for long-term conditions – a concept mapping.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Supporting self-care in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  20. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela CoulterPicker Institute Europe, Oxford.
Glyn Elwyn
Picker Institute Europe · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient involvement is being encouraged by the government and by others as a way of improving the quality of the service provided in general practice. Patients can be involved in their own individual care; for example, in treatment decision making and in disease management; or collectively, by providing feedback on aspects of practice organisation and quality. Active participation in treatment decisions and in self management of chronic conditions can benefit patients in the short-term and may lead to better health outcomes in the longer term, although the evidence for this is currently equivocal. However, the ethical and societal arguments in its favour seem overwhelming. Helping patients to help themselves makes sense for general practitioners as well. Strengthening patients' coping skills could help to reduce inappropriate demands on their time. Involving the public in quality improvement activities has become a key policy direction, and trusts will be required to survey their patients on an annual basis. The proposed new general practitioner contract has recognised the importance of the patient's perspective in its quality framwork. Practices that want to anticipate these trends should look for patient survey instruments to obtain feedback on their organisation and the interpersonal skills of the clinicians.

Indexed as

Patient Care PlanningPatient ParticipationQuality Assurance, Health CareFamily PracticeHumansPatient ComplianceUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID12389766
PMCPMC1316137
OpenAlexW2125031985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.