Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12386110›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Extending the LOINC conceptual schema to support standardized assessment instruments.

Thomas M White, Michael J Hauan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINCDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detailed clinical models: a review.Healthcare informatics research · 2010
    Article
  6. Representing Patient Assessments in LOINC®.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Variation of SNOMED CT coding of clinical research concepts among coding experts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas M WhiteNew York State Office of Mental Health, New York, New York, USA.
Michael J Hauan

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS MH54601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo extend the Clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic schema to support (1) the representation of common types of assessment instruments and (2) the disambiguation of versions and variants that may have differing reliability and validity.

designPsychometric theory and survey research framework, plus an existing tool for implementing many types of assessment instruments (Dialogix), were used to identify and model the attributes of instruments that affect reliability and validity. Four modifications to the LOINC semantic schema were proposed as a means for completely identifying, disambiguating, and operationalizing a broad range of assessment instruments. MEASUREMENTS: Assess the feasibility of modeling these attributes within LOINC, with and without the proposed extensions.

resultsThe existing LOINC schema for supporting assessment instruments was unable to consistently meet either objective. In contrast, the proposed extensions were able to meet both objectives, because they are derived from the Dialogix schema, which already performs those tasks.

conclusionThese extensions to LOINC can facilitate the use, analysis, and improvement of assessment instruments and thereby may improve the detection and management of errors.

Indexed as

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and CodesUser-Computer InterfaceData CollectionFeasibility StudiesHumansNeeds AssessmentPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID12386110
PMCPMC349376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.