Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12384976›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2002

Increase in power of transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.

Ida Malkin, Emil Ginsburg, Robert C Elston

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular genetic studies of complex phenotypes.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2012
    Review
  2. Family-based association study of ROR2 polymorphisms with an array of radiographic hand bone strength phenotypes.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2007
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ida MalkinDepartment of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. idak@post.tau.ac.il
Emil Ginsburg
Robert C Elston

Funding

X-LINKED EXTENSION OF THE REVISED HASEMAN-ELSTON ALGORITHM FOR LINKAGE ANALYSISP41RR003655 · NCRR · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI ELSTON, ROBERT C. · 1987 to 2011
$11.5M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL TRAITSR37GM028356 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ELSTON, ROBERT C. · 1998 to 2007
$2.9M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL TRAITSR01GM028356 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI ELSTON, ROBERT C. · 1985 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS RR03655NIGMS NIH HHS GM28356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allison ([1997] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60:676-690) proposed four versions of the transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) for quantitative traits when there is extreme-threshold sampling, i.e., the trios having an offspring trait value between a priori defined thresholds are excluded from the analysis. Keeping intact the ideology and construction of these tests, we propose here an extreme-offspring design for the trios: for each parent pair of which at least one is heterozygous at a marker locus, the offspring having the most extreme trait value is selected for the trio. Our simulation studies show that the effect of the extreme-offspring design can be quite substantial (up to 30% increase in test power), and that the increase is greater for smaller values of the association parameter and for traits with smaller heritability: just those cases where the increase in power is especially desirable.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait, HeritableData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID12384976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.