Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12383031›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2002

Teratogenic potential of the newer antiepileptic drugs: what is known and how should this influence prescribing?

Carmela Palmieri, Raffaele Canger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Teratogenic effects of pregabalin in mice.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2013
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Epilepsy drugs and effects on fetal development: Potential mechanisms.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Antiepileptic drugs and neurodevelopment.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2006
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmela PalmieriRegional Epilepsy Center, University of Milan Medical School, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Raffaele Canger
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of women of childbearing age who have epilepsy raises many questions because of the interactions between epilepsy, antiepileptic therapy and different aspects of reproductive life. Menstrual cycle disorders and reduced fertility have been partially ascribed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Furthermore, most AEDs induce the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymatic system, altering the metabolism of sex hormones and contributing to the failure of oral contraceptives. Pregnancy represents, in this context, the most critical period because of the well known teratogenic potential of all established AEDs. For most of these drugs no specific patterns of malformations have been identified, although during the past few decades basic knowledge has been acquired, particularly concerning the mechanisms of AED-induced teratogenesis and related risk factors. These issues form the basis of the current guidelines for the management of epilepsy in pregnant women. In the past decade, several new AEDs have been introduced into clinical practice. For a number of reasons, these drugs appear to be more favourable than the older ones as treatments for epilepsy in women of childbearing age. They possess a good pharmacokinetic profile that makes them more stable during pregnancy, and they have a low potential for interaction with other drugs. They are also less likely than the older AEDs to be metabolised to compounds that are teratogenic. Furthermore, most of them do not possess antifolate properties. With the exception of topiramate and vigabatrin, the newer AEDs do not appear to be teratogenic in animals when administered in subtoxic doses. However, animal teratology may not be a reliable predictor of human teratogenicity, and there is a significant lack of information regarding the teratogenic profile of these newer agents in humans. Because clinical experience with these agents is limited, it is advisable to avoid exposure of the embryo to these drugs when pregnancy is planned. The establishment of pregnancy registries could allow for the rapid collection of data related to the administration of new AEDs in pregnancy and the outcomes of such exposure.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAnticonvulsantsEpilepsyFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductionRisk FactorsWomen's HealthAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID12383031
OpenAlexW2077784327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.