ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2002
Functional aspects of co-variant surface charges in an antibody fragment.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of the assembly and function of antibody variable domains.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Antibody Binding Selectivity: Alternative Sets of Antigen Residues Entail High-Affinity Recognition.PloS one · 2015Article
- Engineering venom's toxin-neutralizing antibody fragments and its therapeutic potential.Toxins · 2014Review
- On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2013Review
- Article
- Structure-function relationships of the antigenicity of mycolic acids in tuberculosis patients.Chemistry and physics of lipids · 2010Article
- Physico-chemical determinants of soluble intrabody expression in mammalian cell cytoplasm.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2010Article
- Probing the local conformational change of alpha1-antitrypsin.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A mutational analysis of three co-variant pairs of residues, located at the surface of a single-chain fragment, variable (scFv), remote from the antigen-binding site, was performed to investigate the tolerance of these positions to amino acid changes. The replacements consisted of the elimination or addition of charges, or in their replacement by a charge of opposite sign. As measured by Biacore, antigen-binding kinetics and specificity were essentially unaffected by the mutations. The purified scFvs remained mostly 100% active for 14 h, and their sensitivity to guanidinium-chloride denaturation was similar. These observations indicate that the mutations did not affect antigen-binding properties and that protein folding was conserved. However, the various scFvs differed greatly in half-life in periplasmic extracts (<4 h to >16 h at 25 degrees C). The deleterious effect on half-life produced by single mutations could be reversed by introducing a second mutation that restores the natural combination of amino acids in the co-variant pair, indicating that the consequence of charge modifications at these locations depends on the sequence context. We propose that the differences in half-life result from differences in aggregation propensities with other periplasmic proteins, related to the presence of charged patches at the surface of the scFvs. The practical implication is that changes in surface charge may drastically affect the level of active molecules in complex protein mixtures, a potentially important consideration in engineering scFvs for biotechnological or medical purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.