Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12381822›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2002

Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli.

Alejandro Caicedo, Kyung-Nyun Kim, Stephen D Roper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contribution of TRPC3-mediated CaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Taste Bud Connectome: Implications for Taste Information Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Taste Receptor Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  7. Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  8. Why Taste Is Pharmacology.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Variable Branching Characteristics of Peripheral Taste Neurons Indicates Differential Convergence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. The Role of the Anion in Salt (NaCl) Detection by Mouse Taste Buds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Development and homeostasis of taste buds in mammals].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro CaicedoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA. acaicedo@chroma.med.miami.edu
Kyung-Nyun Kim
Stephen D Roper

Funding

CHEMOSENSORY TRANSDUCTION IN TASTE CELLSR01DC000374 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ROPER, STEPHEN D. · 1989 to 2012
$4.2M
GLUTAMATE NEUROTRANSMISSION IN RAT TASTE BUDSR03DC004525 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CAICEDO VIERKANT, ALEJANDRO · 2000 to 2002
$225k
PROCESSING, ACQUISITION AND MODELING OF MORPHOLOGYF32DC000374 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI GONNERMAN, LAURA M · 1999 to 2000
$39k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC 00374NIDCD NIH HHS DC 04525-01NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000374NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000374NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC004525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory organs are specialized to detect and decode stimuli in terms of intensity and quality. In the gustatory system, the process of identifying and distinguishing taste qualities (e.g. bitter versus sweet) begins in taste buds. A central question in gustatory research is how information about taste quality is extracted by taste receptor cells. For instance, whether and how individual taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli is still a matter for debate. A recent study showed that taste cells expressing bitter-responsive taste receptors do not also express sweet-responsive taste receptors and vice versa. These results suggest that the gustatory system may use separate cellular pathways to process bitter and sweet signals independently. Results from electrophysiological studies, however, reveal that individual taste receptor cells respond to stimuli representing multiple taste qualities. Here we used non-invasive Ca(2+) imaging in slices of lingual tissue containing taste buds to address the issue of quality detection in murine taste receptor cells. We recorded calcium transients elicited by chemical stimuli representing different taste qualities (sweet, salty, sour and bitter). Many receptor cells (38 %) responded to multiple taste qualities, with some taste cells responding to both appetitive ("sweet") and aversive ("bitter") stimuli. Thus, there appears to be no strict and separate detection of taste qualities by distinct subpopulations of taste cells in peripheral gustatory sensory organs in mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBAMicroscopy, ConfocalStimulation, ChemicalTaste BudsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID12381822
PMCPMC2290593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.