ReviewOncogene2002
Selective clonal expansion and microenvironmental permissiveness in tobacco carcinogenesis.
Review in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumour promotion through the lens of evolution.Nature · 2026Review
- Article
- Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- Comprehensive review of epidemiological and animal studies on the potential carcinogenic effects of nicotine per se.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2016Review
- Nicotine/cigarette smoke promotes metastasis of pancreatic cancer through α7nAChR-mediated MUC4 upregulation.Oncogene · 2013Article
- The potential use of protein kinase D inhibitors for prevention/treatment of epidermal tumors.Journal of dermatological science · 2010Article
- Coal dust alters beta-naphthoflavone-induced aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocation in alveolar type II cells.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2009Article
- Article
- Analysis of epidemiological cohort data on smoking effects and lung cancer with a multi-stage cancer model.Carcinogenesis · 2006Article
- Cigarette smoke condensate-induced transformation of normal human breast epithelial cells in vitro.Oncogene · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Historically our knowledge about the direct carcinogenic activity of cigarette smoke and its constituents grew from painting experiments on the skin of mice to produce papillomas and carcinomas. The neutral fraction of cigarette smoke condensate had most of the carcinogenic activity in this test and was rich in carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the most abundant by far being BP. However, the concentration of BP in the condensate was only about 2% the amount of pure BP required to cause skin tumors. In other fractions there were non-carcinogenic constituents that promoted tumor formation when applied repeatedly to mouse skin that had been initiated by a single subcarcinogenic application of BP. There were also constituents of cigarette smoke that acted as co-carcinogens when applied simultaneously with repeated applications of BP. BP was effective as an initiator at lower concentrations than as a complete carcinogen, and some non-carcinogenic PAHs in the condensate were also active initiators. It was concluded from these studies that cigarette smoke condensate is primarily a tumor-promoting and co-carcinogenic agent with weak activity as a complete carcinogen. A major effect of promoters, and possibly of co-carcinogens, is a diffuse hyperplasia which includes selective expansion of clones carrying endogenous mutations and/or mutations induced by PAHs and other carcinogens such as NNK. The induced mutations as well as damaged cells would occur throughout the exposed region and, along with the hyperplasia, increase the permissiveness of the cellular microenvironment for neoplastic expression of any potential tumor cell in its midst. Since neither the promoters nor co-carcinogens in tobacco smoke are known to interact directly with DNA, their effects can be considered epigenetic processes that act upon genetically altered cells. Examples are cited from studies of experimental skin carcinogenesis, smoking-induced histopathological changes in human lung and spontaneous transformation in cell culture to illustrate the genetic and epigenetic interactions of neoplastic development in general and their significance for smoking-induced lung cancer in particular. Certain dietary modifications that appear to be effective in moderating the promotional phase of animal and human carcinogenesis are suggested for trial in managing lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.