Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12379825›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2002

The role of NOS in heart failure: lessons from murine genetic models.

Imran N Mungrue, Mansoor Husain, Duncan J Stewart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Neuroprotective effects of hesperidin on cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats: an experimental study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Modified Buyang Huanwu Decoction.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbiome and intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imran N MungrueDivision of Cell & Molecular Biology, The Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, 12EN-221, 101 College St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Mansoor Husain
Duncan J Stewart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric Oxide Synthases (NOSs) are a group of related proteins that produce nitric oxide (NO). In mammals, there are three known members of this gene family: nNOS (NOS1), iNOS (NOS2) and eNOS (NOS3). Each has been disrupted by targeted gene ablation in mice and the corresponding phenotypes examined. These mice have allowed an examination of the contribution of each NOS in a variety of experimental models and continue to provided insights into the patho-physiological role of NOS and NO. With increasing sophistication, murine transgenic approaches continue to offer a wealth of information, and invaluable tools to further study the NOS system. The focus of this review will be an examination of the tools available, and the insights gained from studies done on murine NOS genetic models in the context of heart failure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood PressureDisease Models, AnimalEndothelium, VascularGene ExpressionHeart FailureMiceMice, KnockoutModels, GeneticNitric OxideNitric Oxide SynthaseNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.