ArticleGut2002
Endoscopic ultrasound in the follow up and response assessment of patients with primary gastric lymphoma.
Article in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01583699 (Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as Diagnostic Tool for Gastrointestinal MALT-lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as Diagnostic Tool for Gastrointestinal MALT-lymphoma
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Application value of gastric contrast ultrasonography in gastric tumors.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- A roadmap for clinical trial design in marginal zone lymphoma.American journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) vs. gastroscopy: Can it improve detection of extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of the stomach followingExpert review of hematology · 2022Review
- Diagnosis and follow-up value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for the gastric involvement of follicular lymphoma.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Gastric Lymphoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2017Review
- A pilot study of confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosing gastrointestinal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Endoscopic features of gastro-intestinal lymphomas: from diagnosis to follow-up.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Epstein-barr virus-associated gastritis: a case report.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2013Article
- Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
- Review
- Article
- Primary Gastric Lymphoma, Epidemiology, Clinical Diagnosis, and Treatment.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the best technique for local staging of primary gastric lymphomas. Its role in the follow up of patients with gastric lymphoma following organ conserving strategies has not been established.
aimTo compare endosonographic response assessment with results of histological evaluation. PATIENTS AND
methodsThirty three patients with primary gastric lymphomas underwent pretreatment EUS and were followed endosonographically every 3-6 months after administration of organ conserving treatment modalities. A wall thickness of <or=4 mm with preserved five layer structure and the absence of suspicious lymph nodes was defined as endosonographic remission. Decrease in wall thickness, increase in echogenicity, and regression of lymph nodes were tested for their value to predict histological remission.
resultsA total of 158 endosonographies were performed (median 4; range 2-12). Within a median follow up period of 15 months (range 3-48), 27 (82%) patients achieved complete histological remission while endosonographic remission was found in 21 (64%) patients. Eighteen patients achieved both forms of remission, with endosonographic remission occurring later (35.1 (11-212.9) weeks v 17.6 (11-97.9) weeks; median (range); p<0.02) than histological remission. A further three patients demonstrated a false negative remission on EUS. Histological relapse was paralleled by endosonographic relapse in only one of five patients. None of the tested endosonographic parameters was able to predict histological remission.
conclusionsIn view of the inferior accuracy of EUS when compared with histology, gastroscopy with biopsy seems sufficient for the routine follow up of patients with gastric lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.