Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12377808›Full record

ArticleGut2002

Endoscopic ultrasound in the follow up and response assessment of patients with primary gastric lymphoma.

A Püspök, M Raderer, A Chott, B Dragosics, A Gangl, R Schöfl

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01583699 (Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as Diagnostic Tool for Gastrointestinal MALT-lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01583699 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as Diagnostic Tool for Gastrointestinal MALT-lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2012 to 2014Enrolled50ConditionsMALT-lymphomaArmsConfocal laser endomicroscopy, Confocal Laser Endomicroscope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Epstein-barr virus-associated gastritis: a case report.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2013
    Article
  11. Primary gastrointestinal lymphoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Primary Gastric Lymphoma, Epidemiology, Clinical Diagnosis, and Treatment.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A PüspökDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, AKH, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. andreas.puespoek@akh-wien.ac.at
M Raderer
A Chott
B Dragosics
A Gangl
R Schöfl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the best technique for local staging of primary gastric lymphomas. Its role in the follow up of patients with gastric lymphoma following organ conserving strategies has not been established.

aimTo compare endosonographic response assessment with results of histological evaluation. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty three patients with primary gastric lymphomas underwent pretreatment EUS and were followed endosonographically every 3-6 months after administration of organ conserving treatment modalities. A wall thickness of <or=4 mm with preserved five layer structure and the absence of suspicious lymph nodes was defined as endosonographic remission. Decrease in wall thickness, increase in echogenicity, and regression of lymph nodes were tested for their value to predict histological remission.

resultsA total of 158 endosonographies were performed (median 4; range 2-12). Within a median follow up period of 15 months (range 3-48), 27 (82%) patients achieved complete histological remission while endosonographic remission was found in 21 (64%) patients. Eighteen patients achieved both forms of remission, with endosonographic remission occurring later (35.1 (11-212.9) weeks v 17.6 (11-97.9) weeks; median (range); p<0.02) than histological remission. A further three patients demonstrated a false negative remission on EUS. Histological relapse was paralleled by endosonographic relapse in only one of five patients. None of the tested endosonographic parameters was able to predict histological remission.

conclusionsIn view of the inferior accuracy of EUS when compared with histology, gastroscopy with biopsy seems sufficient for the routine follow up of patients with gastric lymphoma.

Indexed as

EndosonographyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingStomach NeoplasmsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID12377808
PMCPMC1773440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.