Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12372207›Full record

SynthesisAtencion primaria2002

[Pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness in the elderly. Systematic review and meta-analysis].

J Puig-Barberà, A Belenguer Varea, M Goterris Pinto, M J Brines Benlliure

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Atencion primaria, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Puig-BarberàGrupo de Trabajo de Vacunas de la Sociedad Valenciana de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (SVMFYC). Promoción de Salud. Centro de Salud Pública de Castellón. Spain. jpuigb@terra.es
A Belenguer Varea
M Goterris Pinto
M J Brines Benlliure

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimEstimate pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness in preventing Streptococcus pneumoniae illness in the elderly.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE. MEDLINE, years 1964 to the 2000; EMBASE, from 1988 to the 2000; Cochrane Library, identified studies and previously published systematic reviews citations peruse, and contacts with field experts. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical trials, cohort and case-control studies, published in Spanish, English or French, that estimated pneumococcal disease rates in vaccinated or not vaccinated elderly. DATA EXTRACTION: The studies were valued independently by four investigators with predefined criteria of validity, such as results comparing rates of disease caused by serotypes included in the vaccine, random allocation, double blind design, included subjects pertaining to the same study base, and losses of less than 10% in clinical trials and 20% in observational studies.

resultsEight clinical trials considered the relative risk (RR) of pneumococcal pneumonia, three did not make estimations on pneumonia originated by serotypes included in the vaccine and only one study fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. Vaccinated versus not vaccinated pneumococcal pneumonia RR was 0.86 (95%CI, 0.24 to 2.99). Vaccine effectiveness was 14% (95%CI, -199 to 76%). Ten studies performed estimations on the effectiveness of the vaccine on invasive disease by vaccine serotypes. Of these, two clinical trials and two observational studies fulfilled the required quality criteria. RR of invasive disease was of 0.68 (95%CI, 0.39-1.18); vaccine effectiveness was 32% (95%CI, 18-61%).

conclusionsNo evidence was found supporting pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness to reduce or avoid S. pneumoniae disease in the elderly.

Indexed as

Pneumococcal VaccinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedPneumonia, PneumococcalRandom AllocationRiskPneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID12372207
PMCPMC7684164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.