ArticleNature2002
The grand assault.
Article in Nature, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Optimizing Illumina next-generation sequencing library preparation for extremely AT-biased genomes.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Discovery: an interactive resource for the rational selection and comparison of putative drug target proteins in malaria.Malaria journal · 2009Article
- Genome bias influences amino acid choices: analysis of amino acid substitution and re-compilation of substitution matrices exclusive to an AT-biased genome.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Comparative ORESTES-sampling of transcriptomes of immune-challenged Biomphalaria glabrata snails.Journal of invertebrate pathology · 2008Article
- Development of nuclear DNA markers for evolutionary studies in Plasmodium falciparum.Journal of genetics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12368861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.