Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12365005›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2002

Optimizing radiation-responsive gene promoters for radiogenetic cancer therapy.

S D Scott, M C Joiner, B Marples

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stimulating Innate Immunity to Enhance Radiation Therapy-Induced Tumor Control.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Establishment and characterization of a bladder cancer cell line with enhanced doxorubicin resistance by mevalonate pathway activation.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Influential Factors and Synergies for Radiation-Gene Therapy on Cancer.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Suppression of cancer growth by nonviral gene therapy based on a novel reactive oxygen species-responsive promoter.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S D ScottDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Gray Cancer Institute, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
M C Joiner
B Marples
Northwood University · USMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have been developing synthetic gene promoters responsive to clinical doses of ionizing radiation (IR) for use in suicide gene therapy vectors. The crucial DNA sequences utilized are units with the consensus motif CC(A/T)(6)GG, known as CArG elements, derived from the IR-responsive Egr1 gene. In this study we have investigated the parameters needed to enhance promoter activation to radiation. A series of plasmid vectors containing different enhancer/promoters were constructed, transiently transfected into tumor cells (MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma and U-373MG glioblastoma) and expression of a downstream reporter assayed. Results revealed that increasing the number of CArG elements, up to a certain level, increased promoter radiation-response; from a fold-induction of 1.95 +/- 0.17 for four elements to 2.74 +/- 0.17 for nine CArGs of the same sequence (for MCF-7 cells). Specific alteration of the core A/T sequences caused an even greater positive response, with fold-inductions of 1.71 +/- 0.23 for six elements of prototype sequence compared with 2.96 +/- 0.52 for one of the new sequences following irradiation. Alteration of spacing (from six to 18 nucleotides) between elements had little effect, as did the addition of an adjacent Sp1 binding site. Combining the optimum number and sequence of CArG elements in an additional enhancer was found to produce the best IR induction levels. Furthermore, the improved enhancers also performed better than the previously reported prototype when used in in vitro and in vivo experimental GDEPT. We envisage such enhancers will be used to drive suicide gene expression from vectors delivered to a tumor within an irradiated field. The modest, but tight expression described in the present study could be amplified using a molecular 'switch' system as previously described using Cre/LoxP. In combination with targeted delivery, this strategy has great potential for significantly improving the efficacy of cancer treatment in the large number of cases where radiotherapy is currently employed.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAdenocarcinomaAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsEnhancer Elements, GeneticEnzyme PrecursorsFemaleGene ExpressionGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasmsEnzyme Precursors

Identifiers

PMID12365005
OpenAlexW1972163180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.