ReviewThorax2002
Management of an acute exacerbation of copd: are we ignoring the evidence?
Review in Thorax, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of a respiratory rehabilitation exercise training package in hospitalized elderly patients with acute exacerbation of COPD: a randomized control trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Trial
- Risk factors of hospitalization and readmission of patients with COPD in Hong Kong population: analysis of hospital admission records.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Evaluation of stat orders in a teaching hospital: a chart review.Clinical drug investigation · 2011Article
- Influenza: the virus and prophylaxis with inactivated influenza vaccine in "at risk" groups, including COPD patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2007Review
- COPD exacerbations.5: management.Thorax · 2006Review
- Strategies for improving outcomes of COPD exacerbations.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12364706PMC1766002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.