Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12360236›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2002

Beyond Mendel: an evolving view of human genetic disease transmission.

Jose L Badano, Nicholas Katsanis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic Analysis ofGenes · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Scaling up oligogenic diseases research with OLIDA: the Oligogenic Diseases Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose L BadanoInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 2-127 Jefferson Street Building, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Nicholas Katsanis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methodological and conceptual advances in human genetics have led to the identification of an impressive number of human disease genes. This wealth of information has also revealed that the traditional distinction between Mendelian and complex disorders might sometimes be blurred. Genetic and mutational data on an increasing number of disorders have illustrated how phenotypic effects can result from the combined action of alleles in many genes. In this review, we discuss how an improved understanding of the genetic basis of multilocus inheritance is catalysing the transition from a segmented view of human genetic disease to a conceptual continuum between Mendelian and complex traits.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAllelesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic LinkageGenotypeHaploidyHumansInheritance PatternsMultifactorial InheritancePedigreePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID12360236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.