ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2002
Diagnosing asthma in young children.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of delayed asthma diagnosis with asthma exacerbations in children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Modification of provider behavior to achieve improved asthma outcomes.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a respiratory syndrome that frequently is underdiagnosed, particularly in young children. This primarily results from the lack of clinically useful criteria for making the diagnosis in the absence of objective tests, which are problematic in young children. Because new information suggests that delayed diagnosis may lead to permanently decreased lung function that could be prevented by early treatment, it is important that an accurate diagnosis be made as early as possible. Although simple criteria exist for determining if a patient has asthma, there is a tendency to delay making the diagnosis for a variety of reasons, including the observation that many children who begin wheezing at an early age stop wheezing by the time they are 6 years of age, and concerns over adverse effects from falsely labeling a patient with a potentially stigmatizing condition. Young children who receive an incorrect diagnosis of asthma are at an increased risk of receiving unnecessary medications and may be denied life insurance, health insurance, and admission into the military later in life. On close examination, each of these concerns is unfounded. Early diagnosis of asthma has many potentially positive effects; the negative effects have generally been exaggerated and do not stand up to close scrutiny. Routine use of clinically useful criteria for making the diagnosis, as outlined in this review, may help to simplify the process of making an early diagnosis of asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.