Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12357013›Full record

Trial reportPostgraduate medical journal2002

Investigation and management of iron deficiency anaemia in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a simple management prompt.

E C M Logan, J M Yates, R M Stewart, K Fielding, D Kendrick

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Postgraduate medical journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Decision support tools to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Approach to gastroenterological diseases in primary care.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Prevalence and patterns of testing for anaemia in primary care in England: a cohort study using an electronic health records database.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E C M LoganKing's Mill Centre for Healthcare Services, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, UK. elisabeth.logan@kmc-tr.nhs.uk
J M Yates
R M Stewart
K Fielding
D Kendrick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron deficiency anaemia (IDA) remains the most common cause of anaemia and is frequently secondary to occult gastrointestinal blood loss requiring further investigation. The study was designed to prospectively assess the adequacy of investigation of IDA and to establish whether a simple computerised prompt would increase the completeness of investigation of patients presenting to their general practitioners. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll men aged >20 and women aged >50 newly found to have a probable IDA (n=431) in primary care were randomised according to general practice (n=89) to one of two computer generated prompts, by the haematology laboratories in two large district general hospitals. Data were collected 12 months after the index date. The primary outcome measure was the adequacy of investigation of the cause of anaemia. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyse each binary outcome.

resultsTwo hundred and three (47%) of 431 patients presenting to their general practitioner with an IDA were adequately managed and 140/357 (39%) of patients who were otherwise fit for investigation had no tests at all. Twenty one (17%) of 125 patients who did have adequate investigation at the time of presentation were found to have colorectal cancer. Only 30% of patients had a confirmed diagnosis within 12 months. The prompt did not affect the level of investigation (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.29, p=0.52). The initial prescribing of oral iron was improved (odds ratio 2.19, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.77, p=0.005), but not the documented prescribing of a full therapeutic course or the use of follow up blood counts.

conclusionsThe investigation and management of IDA presenting in general practice remains inadequate and is not improved by a simple management prompt.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyCluster AnalysisFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansIronMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIron

Identifiers

PMID12357013
PMCPMC1742500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.