ArticleJournal of medical ethics2002
"Saviour siblings".
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Conceiving a hematopoietic stem cell donor: twenty-five years after our decision to save a child.Haematologica · 2012Article
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure.Journal of medical ethics · 2006Article
- Is conceiving a child to benefit another against the interests of the new child?Journal of medical ethics · 2005Article
- Commodification of children again and non-disclosure preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington's disease.Journal of medical ethics · 2004Article
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?Journal of medical ethics · 2004Article
- A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome.Journal of medical ethics · 2004Article
- Bach to the future: response to: Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses.Journal of medical ethics · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Victorian Infertility Treatment Authority has given permission to allow tissue typing in combination with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This is a new application of IVF. Not only will it allow parents to select an embryo free from serious genetic disease it will allow them to simultaneously select for a match so that the umbilical cord blood of the resulting baby can provide stem cells to treat an existing sibling who has a disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.