Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12354807›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2002

The efficacy of the heat killing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

C Doig, A L Seagar, B Watt, K J Forbes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Efficacy of Dry Heat Treatment againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accurate Identification of Closely RelatedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Disposal of the large volume of sputum positive forInfection prevention in practice · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid detection ofThe Pan African medical journal · 2020
    Article
  18. Heat Inactivation Renders Sputum Safe and PreservesJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Blockade Effects of Anti-Interferon- (IFN-)Journal of immunology research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C DoigScottish Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Scotland, UK .
A L Seagar
B Watt
K J Forbes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is concern that current procedures for the heat inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis may not be adequate. This raises serious safety issues for laboratory staff performing molecular investigations such as IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. This paper confirms that the protocol of van Embden et al, as performed routinely in this laboratory, is safe and effective for the heat inactivation of M tuberculosis. This procedure involves complete immersion of a tube containing a suspension of one loopfull of growth in a water bath at 80 degrees C for 20 minutes. Seventy four isolates were included in this investigation. Despite prolonged incubation for 20 weeks, none of the heat killed M tuberculosis suspensions produced visible colonies or gave a positive growth signal from liquid culture. This method did not affect the integrity of the DNA for subsequent molecular investigations.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureBacteriological TechniquesHumansLaboratory InfectionMycobacterium tuberculosisSafety ManagementTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID12354807
PMCPMC1769777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.