Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12351715›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2002

Coupled and uncoupled gating and desensitization effects by pore domain mutations in GABA(A) receptors.

Michaela Scheller, Stuart A Forman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. GABABiophysical journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional properties of GABAFrontiers in ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dravet syndrome-associated mutations inBrain communications · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of αβδ and αβγ GABAPharmacological research · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. In Reply.Anesthesiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michaela SchellerKlinik fuer Anaesthesiologie der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen, Klinikum rechts der Isar, D-81675 Munich, Germany.
Stuart A Forman
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Synthetic Chemistry CoreP01GM058448 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, KEITH W · 1999 to 2018
$33.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM058448NIGMS NIH HHS P01-GM58448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GABA(A) receptors are allosteric ligand-gated ion channels. Agonist-induced gating and desensitization have been proposed to be coupled via pore domain structures. Mutations at two alpha1 subunit pore-domain (transmembrane domain 2) residues enhance GABA sensitivity, leucine-to-threonine at position 264 (9'), and serine-to-isoleucine at position 270 (15'). We investigated the role of these residues in gating, desensitization, and deactivation of alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA(A) receptors using rapid GABA concentration jumps and patch-clamp electrophysiology. GABA EC(50) values for alpha1(L264T)beta2gamma2L and alpha1(S270I)beta2gamma2L currents were, respectively, approximately 80-fold and 13-fold lower than the wild-type EC50. Unlike wild type, both mutant receptors displayed significant picrotoxin-sensitive currents in the absence of GABA, indicating that they enhance gating efficacy. Both mutants displayed current activation rates that matched wild type at 1 microm GABA and above. Desensitization of wild-type and alpha1(S270I)beta2gamma2L currents displayed indistinguishable rates and amplitudes, whereas alpha1(L264T)beta2gamma2L currents desensitized extremely slowly. Deactivation of wild-type currents displayed two rates and slowed after partial desensitization, whereas currents from both mutants deactivated slowly with single rate constants that were unaffected by desensitization. These results indicate that both alpha1(L264T) and alpha1(S270I) mutations increase the gating efficacy of receptors by slowing channel closing, which accounts for nearly all of the similar changes that they produce in macrocurrent dynamics. Because the alpha1(S270I) mutation uncouples its gating effects from those on rapid desensitization, these two processes are necessarily associated with movements of distinct receptor structures (gates). The effects of the alpha1(L264T) mutation suggest that the conserved leucines may play a role in gating-desensitization coupling.

Indexed as

Cell LineGABA AntagonistsGABA-A Receptor Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansIon Channel GatingKidneyKineticsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPatch-Clamp TechniquesPicrotoxinProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, GABA-AStructure-Activity RelationshipTransfectionGABA AntagonistsGABA-A Receptor Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidPicrotoxinReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID12351715
PMCPMC6757762
OpenAlexW2146667347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.