Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12324680›Full record

ReviewThorax2002

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 3: Experimental animal models of pulmonary emphysema.

R Mahadeva, S D Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unicentric study of cell therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/pulmonary emphysema.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2011
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Animal models of emphysema.Chinese medical journal · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R MahadevaRespiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, UK. rm232@cam.ac.uk
S D Shapiro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of genetically manipulated mice together with traditional animal studies are steadily increasing our knowledge of the factors important in determining alveolar formation and destruction in emphysema. A review of the animal models used to study emphysema is presented.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringMiceMice, Mutant StrainsMice, TransgenicMutationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary Emphysema

Identifiers

PMID12324680
PMCPMC1746206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.