Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12324673›Full record

Trial reportThorax2002

A randomised trial of self-management planning for adult patients admitted to hospital with acute asthma.

L M Osman, C Calder, D J Godden, J A R Friend, L McKenzie, J S Legge, J G Douglas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Personalised asthma action plans for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Summary of recommendations from the Canadian Asthma Consensus guidelines, 2003.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Health Service Utilization and Poor Health Reporting in Asthma Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  10. Supported self-management for asthma.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of acute asthma in adults in the emergency department: nonventilatory management.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. 2003 canadian asthma consensus guidelines executive summary.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2006
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L M OsmanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, UK. l.osman@abdn.ac.uk
C Calder
D J Godden
J A R Friend
L McKenzie
J S Legge
J G Douglas
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is still debate over the benefit of self-management programmes for adults with asthma. A brief self-management programme given during a hospital admission for acute asthma was tested to determine whether it would reduce readmission.

methodA randomised controlled trial was performed in 280 adult patients with acute asthma admitted over 29 months. Patients on the self-management programme (SMP) received 40-60 minutes of education supporting a written self-management plan. Control patients received standard care (SC).

resultsOne month after discharge SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to report no daytime wheeze (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 5.3), no night disturbance (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.5), and no activity limitation (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.7). Over 12 months 17% of SMP patients were re-admitted compared with 27% of SC patients (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0). Among first admission patients, OR readmission (SMP v SC) was 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.7), p<0.01. For patients with a previous admission, OR readmission was 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.6), p=0.6. SMP patients were more likely than SC patients to be prescribed inhaled steroids at discharge (99% v 92%, p=0.03), oral steroids (98% v 90%, p=0.06), and to have hospital follow up (98% v 84%, p<0.01) but adjustment for these differences did not diminish the effect of the self-management programme.

conclusionsA brief self-management programme during hospital admission reduced post discharge morbidity and readmission for adult asthma patients. The benefit of the programme may have been greater for patients admitted for the first time. The programme also had a small but significant effect on medical management at discharge.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAsthmaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPatient SatisfactionPeak Expiratory Flow RateRecurrenceRisk FactorsSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID12324673
PMCPMC1746210
OpenAlexW2122824129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.