ReviewDrugs2002
The clinical value of erythropoietin in patients with cancer.
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythropoietin has been successfully used in the treatment of cancer-related anaemia. About two-thirds of patients with the 'anaemia of chronic disorders', anaemia due to neoplastic bone marrow infiltration or therapy-related anaemia, are expected to respond to high doses of erythropoietin with a haemoglobin increase of at least 2 g/dl. In the myelodysplastic syndromes, about one-third of patients will show a response when very high doses of erythropoietin are combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The response to erythropoietin is slow, requiring several months to develop. Various factors have been reported to predict a response, but the prediction models proposed are contradictory and have not been prospectively validated. Therefore, the most common strategy to determine the responsiveness of cancer-related anaemia to erythropoietin is to subject the patient to a treatment trial of several months' duration. Treatment with erythropoietin needs to be compared with the transfusion of red blood cells, which has similar effects on the patient's haemoglobin level. Erythropoietin is a generally well tolerated drug, but it is slow to exert an effect and ineffective in a substantial proportion of patients. Red blood cell transfusion is associated with a small risk of infectious, allergic or toxic complications, but it leads to a rapid haemoglobin increase in virtually all patients treated. Cost and cost-benefit analyses from several countries indicate that, in patients with cancer-related anaemia, treatment with erythropoietin is considerably more expensive than the transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells. Thus, the choice between the two treatment options will be influenced by the financial resources of the respective healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.