ArticleGenetics2002
Identification of 1088 new transposon insertions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a pilot study toward large-scale screens.
Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2014Review
- MLT-10 defines a family of DUF644 and proline-rich repeat proteins involved in the molting cycle of Caenorhabditis elegans.Molecular biology of the cell · 2010Article
- Article
- Review
- Technology transfer from worms and flies to vertebrates: transposition-based genome manipulations and their future perspectives.Genome biology · 2007Review
- Low impact of germline transposition on the rate of mildly deleterious mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2006Article
- Transposable element orientation bias in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.Journal of molecular evolution · 2005Article
- Mos as a tool for genome-wide insertional mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans: results of a pilot study.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- Shotgun cloning of transposon insertions in the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans.Comparative and functional genomics · 2004Article
- Article
- From genes to function: the C. elegans genetic toolbox.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We explored the feasibility of a strategy based on transposons to generate identified mutants of most Caenorhabditis elegans genes. A total of 1088 random new insertions of C. elegans transposons Tc1, Tc3, and Tc5 were identified by anchored PCR, some of which result in a mutant phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.