Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12242241›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains.

Kara E Koehler, Jonathan P Cherry, Audrey Lynn, Patricia A Hunt, Terry J Hassold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A rigorous measure of genome-wide genetic shuffling that takes into account crossover positions and Mendel's second law.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Imprinted gene dysregulation in aDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kara E KoehlerDepartment of Genetics and Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and the University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955, USA.
Jonathan P Cherry
Audrey Lynn
Patricia A Hunt
Terry J Hassold
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity School · US

Funding

A Program of Research in Population CytogeneticsR37HD021341 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
A PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN POPULATION CYTOGENETICSR01HD021341 · NICHD · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 1985 to 2009
$5.7M
GENETIC CONTROL OF MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATIONR01HD037502 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUNT, PATRICIA · 2000 to 2009
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS HD21341NICHD NIH HHS HD37502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic background effects on the frequency of meiotic recombination have long been suspected in mice but never demonstrated in a systematic manner, especially in inbred strains. We used a recently described immunostaining technique to assess meiotic exchange patterns in male mice. We found that among four different inbred strains--CAST/Ei, A/J, C57BL/6, and SPRET/Ei--the mean number of meiotic exchanges per cell and, thus, the recombination rates in these genetic backgrounds were significantly different. These frequencies ranged from a low of 21.5 exchanges in CAST/Ei to a high of 24.9 in SPRET/Ei. We also found that, as expected, these crossover events were nonrandomly distributed and displayed positive interference. However, we found no evidence for significant differences in the patterns of crossover positioning between strains with different exchange frequencies. From our observations of >10,000 autosomal synaptonemal complexes, we conclude that achiasmate bivalents arise in the male mouse at a frequency of 0.1%. Thus, special mechanisms that segregate achiasmate chromosomes are unlikely to be an important component of mammalian male meiosis.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsMaleMeiosisMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMicroscopy, FluorescenceRecombination, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID12242241
PMCPMC1462263
OpenAlexW2102536774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.