ReviewDrug safety2002
A benefit-risk assessment of extended-release oxybutynin.
Review in Drug safety, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction, Xerostomia, and Subjective Sialorrhea: A Systematic Review Sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI.Drugs in R&D · 2017Pooled it
- Gastroretentive Technologies in Tandem with Controlled-Release Strategies: A Potent Answer to Oral Drug Bioavailability and Patient Compliance Implications.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Treatment of the overactive bladder syndrome with muscarinic receptor antagonists: a matter of metabolites?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2006Review
- [Anticholinergics for overactive bladder: does subtype selectivity play a role?].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2006Review
- [New pharmacological treatment concepts for overactive bladder].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxybutynin is a muscarinic receptor antagonist, which has been available for a number of years in its original immediate-release (IR) formulation. While oxybutynin IR has proven effective for the treatment of overactive bladder, its extended use can be limited by adverse effects, particularly dry mouth. An extended-release (ER) formulation of oxybutynin based on the OROS system has recently become available, which allows once daily administration. In direct comparison to oxybutynin IR, oxybutynin ER has an increased oral bioavailability for the parent compound oxybutynin which is accompanied by a reduced bioavailability for the active metabolite N-desethyl-oxybutynin. The latter has been implicated in mediating a major part of the adverse effects of oxybutynin treatment. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised studies in patients with overactive bladder have demonstrated that oxybutynin ER has a similar efficacy as oxybutynin IR but with improved tolerability. This is in line with clinical pharmacological studies demonstrating a smaller impairment of saliva production with oxybutynin ER than with oxybutynin IR. Thus, the ER formulation of oxybutynin maintains the therapeutic benefits and concomitantly improves tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.