ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2002
Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in cardiovascular disease care: an Australian cohort study on sex differences in receipt of coronary procedures.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Use of exercise tests in primary care: importance for referral decisions and possible bias in the decision process; a prospective observational study.BMC family practice · 2014Observational
- Gender and Age Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2014Article
- Examining sex and gender disparities in total joint arthroplasty.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011Review
- Gender differences in the surgical management and early clinical outcome of coronary artery disease: Single centre experience.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2010Article
- Sex differences in use of interventional cardiology persist after risk adjustment.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2009Article
- Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.American heart journal · 2008Article
- Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2007Article
- Gender differences in the clinical management of patients with angina pectoris: a cross-sectional survey in primary care.BMC health services research · 2007Article
- Gender differences in cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2007Review
- Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2005Article
- Women with coronary artery disease report worse health-related quality of life outcomes compared to men.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2004Article
- Gender inequality in the clinical outcomes of equally treated acute coronary syndrome patients in Saudi Arabia.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectives: To compare the clinical management and health outcomes of men and women after admission with acute coronary syndromes, after adjusting for disease severity, sociodemographic, and cardiac risk factors.
designProspective national survey of acute cardiac admissions followed up by mailed patient questionnaire two to three years after initial admission.
settingRandom sample of 94 district general hospitals in the UK. PATIENTS: 1064 patients under 70 years old recruited between April 1995 and November 1996. MAIN
resultsOf the 1064 patients recruited, 126 (11.8%) died before follow up. Of the 938 survivors, 719 (76.7%) completed a follow up questionnaire. There were no gender differences in the use of cardiac investigations during the index admission or follow up period. However, male patients with hypertension were more likely to undergo rehabilitation compared with female hypertensive patients (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 4.72). Men were also more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than women (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.21 to 3.00), but there was no gender difference in the use of revascularisation overall (p=0.14). An indirect indication that the gender differences in CABG were not attributable to bias was provided by the lack of gender differences in health outcomes, which implies that patients received the care they needed.
conclusionsDespite the extensive international literature referring to a gender bias in favour of men with coronary heart disease, this national survey found no gender differences in the use of investigations or in revascularisation overall. However, the criteria used for selecting percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with CABG requires further investigation as does the use of rehabilitation. It is unclear whether the clinical decisions to provide these procedures are made solely on the basis of clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.