ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2002
Myocardial infarction in an urban population: worse long term prognosis for patients from less affluent residential areas.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Neighborhood Differences in Post-Stroke Mortality.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2017Article
- Individual education, area income, and mortality and recurrence of myocardial infarction in a Medicare cohort: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.BMC public health · 2014Article
- Immigrant status and increased risk of heart failure: the role of hypertension and life-style risk factors.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2012Article
- Country of birth and risk of hospitalization due to heart failure: a Swedish population-based cohort study.European journal of epidemiology · 2011Article
- Socioeconomic status and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a study from Iran.International journal for equity in health · 2011Article
- Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation.American journal of preventive medicine · 2007Article
- Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveThe objective in this follow up study from the Malmö myocardial infarction register has been to assess whether long term survival following discharge after first myocardial infarction has any relation with the socioeconomic environment and to assess to what extent intra-urban differences in mortality from ischaemic heart disease can be accounted for by covariance with long term survival following discharge after acute myocardial infarction.
designRegister based surveillance study.
settingSeventeen residential areas in the city of Malmö, Sweden.
participantsThe cohort contains all 2931 male and 2083 female patients with myocardial infarction who were discharged for the first time between 1986-95 from Malmö University Hospital. MAIN
resultsDuring the on average 4.9 years of follow up 55% of the patients died. The sex adjusted and age adjusted all cause mortality rate/1000 patient years ranged between residential areas from 85.5 to 163.6. The area specific relative risk of death after discharge was associated with a low socioeconomic score, r=-0.56, p=0.018. Major risk factors for cardiovascular disease were more prevalent in areas with low socioeconomic score and low rates of survival. Of the intra-urban differences in mortality from ischaemic heart disease, 41% could be accounted for by differences with regard to the survival rate after discharge.
conclusionsThe results are compatible with the hypothesis that the socioeconomic environment plays an important part in the survival rate of patients with myocardial infarction. To assess the preventive potential, the extent to which socioeconomic circumstances covary with severity of disease, respectively with the use and compliance with secondary preventive measures, needs to be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.