Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12238644›Full record

ReviewSexually transmitted infections2002

Using the evidence base on genital herpes: optimising the use of diagnostic tests and information provision.

A Scoular

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexually transmitted infections, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2015
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Genital herpes.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genital herpes in Canada: Deciphering the hidden epidemic.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2012
    Article
  12. The diagnosis of genital herpes - beyond culture: An evidence-based guide for the utilization of polymerase chain reaction and herpes simplex virus type-specific serology.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2007
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. National survey of diagnostic services for genital herpes.Sexually transmitted infections · 2005
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A ScoularDepartment of Genitourinary Medicine, The Sandyford Initiative, Glasgow, UK. anne@scoular.demon.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been several important advances in the range of available diagnostic tests for genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in recent years; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is emerging in routine clinical use and the potential role of type specific serological tests is currently under debate. Several large trials of prophylactic vaccines, subsequently proved to be ineffective, have expanded knowledge of the transmission and epidemiology of HSV infection. This article discusses optimal application of recent research evidence to clinical care, structured around the key issues for patients and their partners. These include acquisition and transmission of genital HSV-1 and HSV-2 infection, the natural history of genital herpes, and the role of partner notification.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineFemaleHerpes GenitalisHerpesvirus 1, HumanHerpesvirus 2, HumanHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSerologic TestsSexual PartnersVirology

Identifiers

PMID12238644
PMCPMC1744455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.