Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12232289›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1994

Changes in the Accumulation of [alpha]- and [beta]-Tubulin Isotypes during Cotton Fiber Development.

D. C. Dixon, R. W. Seagull, B. A. Triplett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Carbon partitioning to cellulose synthesis.Plant molecular biology · 2001
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D. C. DixonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, P.O. Box 19687, New Orleans, Louisiana 70179.
R. W. Seagull
B. A. Triplett
United States Department of Agriculture · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expression of [alpha]- and [beta]-tubulin proteins in developing fibers and several other tissues of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, cv Texas Marker 1) have been analyzed by immunoblots of one- and two-dimensional gels utilizing anti-tubulin antibodies as probes. As a percentage of total protein, fibers had greater amounts of tubulin than did hypocotyls, roots, leaves, or cotyledons. Both [alpha]- and [beta]-tubulin, having apparent molecular masses of approximately 50 kD and isoelectric points between pH 5 and pH 6, were resolved on a single two-dimensional gel. Under the conditions used, [alpha]-tubulin was less acidic in the isoelectric focusing dimension and migrated slightly faster in the sodium dodecyl sulfate dimension than did [beta]-tubulin. Nine [alpha]-tubulin isotypes that formed two distinct groups were identified on immunoblots of two-dimensional gels. The three most abundant [alpha]-tubulin isotypes were common to all tissues examined. Seven distinct [beta]-tubulin isotypes were also identified. Although their level of accumulation differed, four of the [beta]-tubulin isotypes were common to all tissues. Preferential accumulation of isotypes was more apparent in fibers than in the other tissues examined. Two [alpha]-tubulin isotypes and two [beta]-tubulin isotypes showed preferential accumulation in 10- and 20-d postanthesis fibers, respectively.

Identifiers

PMID12232289
PMCPMC159467
OpenAlexW1523949295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.