ArticleThe Journal of physiology2002
NO- and non-NO-, non-prostanoid-dependent vasodilatation in rat sciatic nerve during maturation and developing experimental diabetic neuropathy.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Through Its Powerful Antioxidative Properties, L-Theanine Ameliorates Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy in Rats.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Arginine Biosynthesis Pathway Found to Play a Key Role in the Neuroprotective Effect of Liu-Wei-Luo-Bi (LWLB) Granules in Diabetic db/db Mice with Peripheral Neuropathy Using an Untargeted Metabolomics Strategy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
- Developmental changes in myoendothelial gap junction mediated vasodilator activity in the rat saphenous artery.The Journal of physiology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined NO- and non-NO-, non-prostanoid-dependent pathways of agonist-induced vasodilatation in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats and their age-matched controls at 1-2, 8-10 and 18-20 weeks after induction of diabetes. Using laser Doppler flowmetry, vasodilatory responses to acetylcholine (ACh; 0.1 mM) and morpholino-sydnonimine (SIN-1) were determined in the presence of Ringer solution, during inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) and cyclo-oxygenase (COX) with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; 1 mM) + indomethacin (10(-5) M), and during inhibition of K(+) channels, NOS and COX with tetraethylammonium (TEA; 10 mM) + L-NNA + indomethacin. Basal NOS activity and nerve conduction velocity were also determined. In age-matched controls, SIN-1-induced vasodilatation in the presence of TEA + L-NNA + indomethacin, basal NOS activity and the initial vasodilatory response to ACh during NOS and COX inhibition all decreased with maturation. In STZ-induced diabetics, SIN-1-induced vasodilatation in the presence of TEA + L-NNA + indomethacin was impaired immediately after induction of diabetes, but not at 18-20 weeks. NOS activity in STZ-induced diabetics displayed a transient 2-fold increase at 8-10 weeks, decreasing to age-matched control levels at 18-20 weeks. At 18-20 weeks of STZ-induced diabetes, ACh-induced vasodilatation during NOS and COX inhibition was prolonged due to increased K(+) channel activity and experimental diabetic sensory neuropathy (EDN) had developed. Thus, in sciatic nerve microcirculation of STZ-induced diabetic rats: (1) diabetic impairment of vasodilatation in response to exogenous NO was transient; (2) non-NO-, non-prostanoid-dependent vasodilatation and K(+) channel activity were augmented in STZ-induced diabetes; and (3) alterations in NO bioactivity were not related to the development of EDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.