Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12228608›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1995

[beta]-Tubulin Accumulation and DNA Replication in Imbibing Tomato Seeds.

R. D. De Castro, X. Zheng, JHW. Bergervoet, CHR. De Vos, R. J. Bino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Feedback Microtubule Control and Microtubule-Actin Cross-talk inMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R. D. De CastroCenter for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research, Department of Reproduction Technology, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands (R.D.d.C., J.H.W.B., C.H.R.D.V., R.J.B.).
X. Zheng
JHW. Bergervoet
CHR. De Vos
R. J. Bino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activation of the cell cycle in embryo root tips of imbibing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Lerica) seeds was studied by flow cytometric analyses of the nuclear DNA content and by immunodelection of [beta]-tubulin. With dry seeds, flow cytometric profiles indicated that the majority of the cells were arrested at the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In addition, [beta]-tubulin was not detectable on western blots. Upon imbibition of water, the number of cells in G2 started to increase after 24 h, and a 55-kD [beta]-tubulin signal was detected between 24 and 48 h. Two-dimensional immunoblots revealed at least three different [beta]-tubulin isotypes. Thus, [beta]-tubulin accumulation and DNA replication were induced during osmotic priming. These processes, as well as seed germination rate, were enhanced upon subsequent imbibition of water, compared with control seeds that imbibed but were not primed. By contrast, when aged seeds imbibed, DNA replication, [beta]-tubulin accumulation, and germination were delayed. In all cases studied, both DNA replication and [beta]-tubulin accumulation preceded visible germination. We suggest that activation of these cell-cycle-related processes is a prerequisite for tomato seed germination. Furthermore, [beta]-tubulin expression can be used as a parameter for following the initial processes that are activated during seed imbibition.

Identifiers

PMID12228608
PMCPMC157612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.