Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12228271›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2002

Interplay between protective and inhibitory antibodies dictates the outcome of experimentally disseminated Candidiasis in recipients of a Candida albicans vaccine.

Carla Bromuro, Antonella Torosantucci, Paola Chiani, Stefania Conti, Luciano Polonelli, Antonio Cassone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glycan microarray analysis ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Toxins · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibody Peptide based antifungal immunotherapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carla BromuroDepartment of Bacteriology and Medical Mycology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, USA.
Antonella Torosantucci
Paola Chiani
Stefania Conti
Luciano Polonelli
Antonio Cassone
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice immunized with heat-inactivated, whole yeast-form cells (Y cells) of Candida albicans developed intense, specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. However, they were modestly protected against a lethal challenge by the fungus, and their sera did not confer passive protection upon nonimmunized animals. Surprisingly, this immune serum conferred an elevated degree of passive protection to normal and SCID mice when preadsorbed on whole C. albicans cells. After adsorption, no antibodies specific to mannoprotein (MP)-rich extracts or secretions were detected by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and no serum reaction with the fungal cell surface was seen in immunofluorescence assays. However, this serum had totally preserved the level of other antibodies, in particular those reacting with beta-1,3 and beta-1,6 glucan (GG). The hypothesis that anti-GG antibodies contributed to the passive protection was suggested by the following circumstantial evidence: (i) mice immunized with C. albicans cells treated with dithiothreitol and protease (YDP cells), which exposed GG on their surfaces and generated anti-GG but not anti-MP antibodies, were substantially protected against a lethal fungus challenge; (ii) the sera, and their immunoglobulin fractions, of mice immunized with YDP cells transferred protection to nonimmune animals; and (iii) this passive protection was substantially abolished by preadsorption on GG but not on intact cells. Overall, our findings demonstrate that some anti-Candida antibodies can block the protective potential of immune serum, a potential to which anti-GG antibodies appear to contribute. Our observations may also help explain why subjects with elevated anti-Candida antibody titers, inclusive of anti-MP and anti-GG antibodies, remain nonetheless susceptible to invasive candidiasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, FungalAntigens, FungalCandida albicansCandidiasisDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFungal VaccinesGlucansHumansImmunization, PassiveMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, SCIDAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, FungalAntigens, FungalFungal VaccinesGlucansmannoproteinsMembrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID12228271
PMCPMC128316
OpenAlexW2168271732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.