ReviewImmunology2002
Bugs as drugs for cancer.
Review in Immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Bacterial cancer therapy using the attenuated fowl-adaptedMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Article
- Bacterial Therapy of Cancer: Promises, Limitations, and Insights for Future Directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Article
- TLR3 agonists and proinflammatory antitumor activities.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2013Article
- The application of Toll like receptors for cancer therapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2010Review
- Exploitation of the Toll-like receptor system in cancer: a doubled-edged sword?British journal of cancer · 2006Review
- Closely related mycobacterial strains demonstrate contrasting levels of efficacy as antitumor vaccines and are processed for major histocompatibility complex class I presentation by multiple routes in dendritic cells.Infection and immunity · 2005Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.