Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12224015›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2002

Electrically mediated delivery of vector plasmid DNA elicits an antitumor effect.

L C Heller, D Coppola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptomic analysis of the immune response toMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In vitro and in vivo correlation of skin and cellular responses to nucleic acid delivery.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The impact of non-electrical factors on electrical gene transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L C HellerCenter for Molecular Delivery, c/o Department of Surgery MDC16, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
D Coppola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo electroporation is an efficient means of increasing plasmid DNA delivery to normal tissues, such as skin and muscle, as well as directly to tumors. In the experiments described here, plasmid DNA was delivered by in vivo electroporation to B16 mouse melanomas using two very different pulsing protocols. Reporter expression increased 21- or 42-fold, respectively with electroporation over injection alone. The growth of experimental melanomas with an approximate diameter of 4 mm on the day of treatment was monitored after electroporation delivery of reporter plasmid DNA. Remarkably, short-term complete regressions using one of these pulsing protocols occurred in up to 100% of mice. These regressions continued long term in up to 83% of animals. 70% of these mice were resistant to challenge with B16 melanoma cells. Histological analysis revealed large numbers of apoptotic cells 24 h after treatment. This antitumor effect did not require therapeutic cDNA expression or eukaryotic sequences.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisElectroporationFemaleGenes, ReporterGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred StrainsPlasmids

Identifiers

PMID12224015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.