ReviewJournal of physiology and biochemistry2002
Improvement of DNA transfection with cationic liposomes.
Review in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transfection of mouse cochlear explants by electroporation.Current protocols in neuroscience · 2010Article
- Micelles and nanoparticles for ultrasonic drug and gene delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of cationic liposomes as vectors for DNA transfection of eukaryotic cells is due to its high efficiency and reproducibility. After the interaction of the DNA cationic-liposome complexes (DNA-CLC) with the plasma membrane, the entry into the cells delivers the DNA-CLC to the endosome-lysosome pathway where some of the DNA-CLC are degraded. The non-degraded DNA that escapes to the cytoplasm, still has to transverse the nuclear membrane to be transcribed and then translated. To improve the efficiency of the whole process, we can manipulate the DNA (sequences, promoters, enhancers, nuclear localisation signals, etc), the DNA-CLC (lipids) or the plasmatic, endosomal and/or nuclear cellular membranes (ultrasound, electroporation, Ca++, pH of the endosomes, mitosis, fusogenic peptides, nuclear localisation signals, etc). Most of these methods have been generally used individually but in combination, may greatly improve the efficiency and reproducibility of in vitro transfection. While much of this work remains yet to be done and present results further explored, the application of these efforts is essential to the future development of new gene therapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.