Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12221226›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2002

Energy restriction reduces fractional calcium absorption in mature obese and lean rats.

Mariana Cifuentes, Amy B Morano, Hasina A Chowdhury, Sue A Shapses

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Overweight postmenopausal women lose bone with moderate weight reduction and 1 g/day calcium intake.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2005
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exercise during energy restriction mitigates bone loss but not alterations in estrogen status or metabolic hormones.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bone metabolism in obesity and weight loss.Annual review of nutrition · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana CifuentesDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Amy B Morano
Hasina A Chowdhury
Sue A Shapses
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF BONE TURNOVERR01AG012161 · NIA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SHAPSES, SUE AMY · 2000 to 2014
$3.4M
NUTRITIONAL REGULATION OF BONE TURNOVERR29AG012161 · NIA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SHAPSES, SUE AMY · 1994 to 1998
–
NIA NIH HHS AG-12161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG012161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight loss is associated with bone loss and the risk may be greater in lean than heavier individuals, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. We hypothesized that energy restriction (EnR) would decrease true fractional Ca absorption (TFCA) and be mediated by Ca-regulating hormones, but differently in obese and lean rats. Rats were fed a high fat (47% energy) or low fat (16% energy) diet for 4 mo. At 6 mo of age, the resulting lean [284 +/- 28g (mean +/- SD, n = 18)] and obese (319 +/- 34g, n = 20) groups (P < 0.005) were divided into controls (CTL, ad libitum) and energy-restricted (40% restriction) groups. At baseline, bone resorption (urinary crosslinks) was higher and bone formation (serum osteocalcin) was lower in obese than in lean rats, whereas Ca balance components and Ca-regulating hormones did not differ. EnR for 10 wk reduced body weight by 25 +/- 7% compared with a 6 +/- 6% gain in CTL rats (P < 0.001). For both lean and obese rats, TFCA (5-d measurement, (45)Ca radioisotope) decreased from 30 +/- 9% to 24 +/- 9% with EnR, compared with 25 +/- 10% to 29 +/- 11% in controls (P < 0.05). Weight loss was directly correlated with the decrease in TFCA (r = 0.34, P < 0.05). Uterine weights indicated a reduced estrogenic activity in energy-restricted rats (P < 0.0001). In lean, but not obese rats, serum estradiol (E(2)) correlated with weight loss (r = 0.52, P < 0.05), and tended to correlate with the decrease in TFCA (r = 0.48, P = 0.06). At the end of the study, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D was lower and urinary Ca was higher in lean than obese energy-restricted rats. Distinct endocrine profiles during weight loss in obese and lean rats suggest that the susceptibility of bone and Ca metabolism to EnR could differ depending on initial body weight.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightBone and BonesCalciumCalcium, DietaryCorticosteroneCreatinineDiet, ReducingEnergy IntakeEstradiolFemaleIntestinal AbsorptionObesityParathyroid HormoneRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley25-hydroxyvitamin DCalciumCalcium, DietaryCorticosteroneCreatinineEstradiolParathyroid HormoneVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID12221226
PMCPMC4010555
OpenAlexW1944701027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.