ReviewDrugs2002
Management of bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients with diabetes mellitus.
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of complicated urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes: a questionnaire study in primary care.European journal of epidemiology · 2007Trial
- Short-term temporal variation in the early-life gut microbiota links maternal clinical phenotypes to neonatal jaundice.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Healthcare-associated infections and the distribution of causative pathogens in patients with diabetes mellitus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2013Article
- Prevalence of lower urinary tract infection in South Indian type 2 diabetic subjects.Indian journal of nephrology · 2009Article
- Differences in the pattern of antibiotic prescription profile and recurrence rate for possible urinary tract infections in women with and without diabetes.Diabetes care · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common and tend to have a more complicated course in patients with diabetes mellitus than in the general population. The mechanisms that potentially contribute to the increased prevalence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic bacteriuria in these patients are defects in the local urinary cytokine secretions and an increased adherence of the microorganisms to the uroepithelial cells. The need for treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria remains controversial. No evidence is available on the optimal treatment of acute cystitis and pyelonephritis in patients with diabetes. Because of the frequent (asymptomatic) upper tract involvement and the possible serious complications, many experts recommend a 7- to 14-day oral antibacterial regimen for bacterial cystitis in these patients, with an antibacterial agent that achieves high concentrations both in the urine and in urinary tract tissues. The recommended treatment of acute pyelonephritis does not differ from that in patients without diabetes. Clinical trials specifically dealing with the treatment of UTIs in patients with diabetes, comparing the optimal duration and choice of antibacterial agent, are needed. In addition, new approaches to preventive strategies must prove their value in this specific patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.