Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12214254›Full record

ReviewOncogene2002

Loss of p53 and centrosome hyperamplification.

Pheruza Tarapore, Kenji Fukasawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Radiotherapy modulates tumor cell fate decisions: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Genomic landscape of a mouse model of diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Centrosome instability: when good centrosomes go bad.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cytokinesis defects and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pheruza TaraporeDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine PO Box 670521, Cincinnati, Ohio, OH 45267-0521, USA.
Kenji Fukasawa
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

P53 Mediated Regulation of Centrosome DuplicationR01CA090522 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI FUKASAWA, KENJI · 2001 to 2010
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA90522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss or mutational inactivation of p53 has been shown to lead to abnormal amplification of centrosomes through deregulation of the centrosome duplication cycle and failure to undergo cytokinesis. In mouse cells, most cases of centrosome hyperamplification are attributed to deregulation of centrosome duplication. The presence of excess copies of centrosomes increases the frequency of mitotic defects, leading to unbalanced chromosome transmission to daughter cells. p53 controls centrosome duplication via transactivation-dependent and transactivation-independent mechanisms. In its transactivation-dependent control, p21(Waf1/Cip1) acts as a major effector, likely guarding against untimely activation of CDK2/cyclin E kinase, hence ensuring the coordinated initiation of centrosome and DNA duplication. p53 appears to exert its transactivation-independent control through direct physical binding to the centrosomes.

Indexed as

CentrosomeGene DeletionGenes, p53HumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID12214254
OpenAlexW2332657611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.