ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2002
Human diallelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Polymorphisms and Forensic Efficiencies of a Set of Novel Autosomal InDel Markers in a Chinese Mongolian Group.BioMed research international · 2020Trial
- Identification of Triploid Plants in Seed-Derived Progeny of Cultivated Olive.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Mapping of resistance genes to powdery mildew based on DNA re-sequencing and bulk segregant analysis in Capsicum.Protoplasma · 2025Article
- Article
- Comprehensive elucidation on the genetic profile of the Hezhou Han populationForensic sciences research · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Genotyping strategies for tissues fixed with various embalming fluids for human identification, databasing, and traceability.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Developmental validation of a novel all-in one assay of X chromosomal multi-insertion/deletion loci for forensic genetics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- InDEL instability in two different tumoral tissues and its forensic significance.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Modern Plant Breeding Techniques in Crop Improvement and Genetic Diversity: From Molecular Markers and Gene Editing to Artificial Intelligence-A Critical Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Success rate of rapid DNA technology in kinship analysis for forensic purpose.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Tumor Neoepitope-Based Vaccines: A Scoping Review on Current Predictive Computational Strategies.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the usefulness of insertion-null markers in critical skeletal remains.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- Forensic features and phylogenetic structure survey of four populations from southwest ChinaForensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Systematical explorations of forensic feature and population genetic diversity of the Chinese Mongolian group from northwest ChinaForensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Developmental validation of the AGCU YNFS Y Kit: A new 6-dye multiplex system with 44 Y-STRs and 5 Y-InDels for forensic application.PloS one · 2024Article
- A biallelic multiple nucleotide length polymorphism explains functional causality at 5p15.33 prostate cancer risk locus.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Study on the Association betweenGenes · 2023Article
- Genetic polymorphisms and population genetic analyses of 57 autosomal InDel loci in Hubei Tujia group.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report the identification and characterization of 2,000 human diallelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels) distributed throughout the human genome. Candidate indels were identified by comparison of overlapping genomic or cDNA sequences. Average confirmation rate for indels with a > or =2-nt allele-length difference was 58%, but the confirmation rate for indels with a 1-nt length difference was only 14%. The vast majority of the human diallelic indels were monomorphic in chimpanzees and gorillas. The ratio of deletionrcolon;insertion mutations was 4.1. Allele frequencies for the indels were measured in Europeans, Africans, Japanese, and Native Americans. New alleles were generally lower in frequency than old alleles. This tendency was most pronounced for the Africans, who are likely to be closest among the four groups to the original modern human population. Diallelic indels comprise approximately 8% of all human polymorphisms. Their abundance and ease of analysis make them useful for many applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.