ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2002
Comparison between the skin snip test and simple dot blot assay as potential rapid assessment tools for Onchocerciasis in the postcontrol era in Ghana.
Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-resolution mapping of onchocerciasis risk in Ghana using spatial machine learning models.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of OvMANE1 and OvMCBL02 Multiepitope Antigens for the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Onchocerciasis Exposure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tandem Use of OvMANE1 and Ov-16 ELISA Tests Increases the Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Human Onchocerciasis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful control of onchocerciasis through mass distribution of ivermectin needs to be coupled with reliable, sensitive, specific, yet affordable diagnostic methods to monitor and ensure the efficacy of such measures. The effort put into the development of diagnostic methods for onchocerciasis that can substitute for or work in combination with the present "gold standard," the skin snip test, has resulted in the discovery of a number of immunogenic proteins with potential use as diagnostic tools in the postcontrol era. Most of these proteins have now been produced through recombinant DNA techniques. However, when costs are not a trivial issue, none of them have yet found their way into the areas where the disease still exists. In the present study, we have evaluated the performance of a simple dot blot assay which uses a mixture of native proteins designated PakF as a serious contender in the quest for a less invasive and more sensitive method to detect Onchocerca volvulus infection in areas with diverse endemicities. Our results indicate that the assay we propose is more sensitive than the skin snip test and shows high specificity, both characteristics required for a suitable tool for the monitoring of onchocerciasis in the postcontrol era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.